- 
          
 - 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 39
 
Open
Labels
enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request
Description
Have you checked for existing feature requests?
- Completed
 
Summary
I don't even know if there's a good solution here, but this is our current situation:
- For all the redesigns, the 
documentationrepo is the CSS source of truth; it emits a stylesheet that the others consume. Theblogandpulsar-edit.github.iorepos define their own CSS overrides, but often want to consult the original Less includes (i.e., the breakpoints and mixins) and can't; so they get duplicated across repos. - The sites may or may not want to highlight different things in their navigation areas, but otherwise should basically have the same page header and page footer. Right now, this is another thing that must be duplicated across three repos.
 
I don't have a preferred recommendation here because they'd all involve some pain. But here are some ideas:
- Git submodule? (Ugh.)
- Pros: would allow us to reference the individual files rather easily.
 - Cons: Now we've got four repos instead of three, and keeping everything in sync still requires manual submodule updates and redeploys of each site.
 
 - Extend 
11ty-config-pulsar?- Not sure how easy it is to even reference Less or EJS resources from a Node module, but maybe it's possible via 
require.resolveor something. And maybe it can define some EJS helpers that can do most of the work instead of forcing us to reach in and include the module's own EJS files. - Pros: We're already using it in the other two repos.
 - Cons: Same deployment headaches as above, though they may be slightly mitigated if the 
package.jsonversion just points togithub:confused-Techie/11ty-config-pulsar#mainand therefore always gets the latest upon redeploy. 
 - Not sure how easy it is to even reference Less or EJS resources from a Node module, but maybe it's possible via 
 
What benefits does this feature provide?
Less duplication; more consistency.
Any alternatives?
The two possible solutions above are the only ones I can think of for now, but I'm eager to hear others if folks have ideas.
Other than that, the alternative is living with the status quo — which is annoying but not debilitating.
Other examples:
No response
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request