add logic to generate OBO token

[samikay101]

Commit Type

• feature - New functionality
• fix - Bug fix
• refactor - Code restructuring without behavior change
• perf - Performance improvement
• docs - Documentation update
• test - Test-related changes
• chore - Maintenance/tooling

Risk Level

• Low - Minor changes, limited scope
• Medium - Moderate changes, some user impact
• High - Major changes, significant user/system impact

What & Why

Impact of Change

• Users:
• Developers:
• System:

Test Plan

• Unit tests added/updated
• E2E tests added/updated
• Manual testing completed
• Tested in:

Contributors

Screenshots/Videos

[github-actions]

🤖 AI PR Validation Report

PR Review Results

Thank you for your submission! Here's detailed feedback on your PR title and body compliance:

❌ PR Title

• Current: add logic to generate OBO token
• Issue: The PR title is too brief and lacks clarity about the scope and details of the change. It doesn't specify which part of the system is being affected, or what the impact is.
• Recommendation: Make your PR title more descriptive and specific. Example: Add logic to generate OAuth2 OBO token for agent authentication in LogicAppsUX workflow engine

---

❌ Commit Type

• No commit type selected. All boxes are unchecked.
• If more than one commit type applies, you may leave a comment, but at least one must be selected.

---

❌ Risk Level

• No risk level selected. All boxes are unchecked.
• At least one risk level must be selected. Also, given the code diff (adds significant logic for token generation), the risk is likely high due to its authentication/system-wide implications.

---

❌ What & Why

• Current: (Missing)
• Issue: This section is blank.
• Recommendation: Briefly summarize what this change does (e.g., implementing OBO token generation) and why it’s needed (e.g., required for agent authentication flows).

---

❌ Impact of Change

• No impact assessment provided—all sections are the template only.
• Recommendation:
  • Users: Indicate if any user-facing authentication changes occur
  • Developers: Note API changes or new integration patterns
  • System: State if performance, architecture, or dependencies are affected (very likely for token logic)

---

❌ Test Plan

• No test boxes checked. No explanation if not required.
• Test plan is required for logic changes. Indicate at minimum what manual, unit, or integration testing was performed.

---

⚠️ Contributors

• Section blank. Not required, but remember to give credit to PMs, designers, or reviewers if applicable.

---

⚠️ Screenshots/Videos

• Section blank, appropriate for non-visual logic. No action needed; if UI impacted, screenshots are required.

---

Summary Table

Section	Status	Recommendation
Title	❌	Be explicit about OBO token logic and scope
Commit Type	❌	Select at least one
Risk Level	❌	Select one risk level (likely 'high')
What & Why	❌	Add a brief summary
Impact of Change	❌	Clarify users, developers, and system impacts
Test Plan	❌	Indicate, check, or explain test coverage
Contributors	⚠️	Add if any others helped
Screenshots/Videos	⚠️	None needed unless UI changes

---

Please update the PR title and body as recommended above, then re-submit. You must select a commit type, risk level, and provide context, impact, and a test plan for all functional changes. Add a risk label to match your chosen risk level—recommended as 'risk:high' based on the diff. Thank you for helping maintain high-quality documentation for your team!

---

Last updated: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 21:02:49 GMT