Skip to content

Conversation

@ogarbe
Copy link

@ogarbe ogarbe commented Apr 27, 2015

  • close socket
  • close socket on destructor
  • public function close
  • formatted response (header / body ...)

@Timandes
Copy link
Contributor

I also think splitting the response is a good idea, but it's probably not compatible with existing codes.
I suggest we could provide a parameter, or at least a switch to make things more flexible.

@ogarbe
Copy link
Author

ogarbe commented Apr 28, 2015

i've added it

@Timandes
Copy link
Contributor

Amazing efficiency!

@ogarbe
Copy link
Author

ogarbe commented May 13, 2015

@adoy : hello, what do you think about this ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants