-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
chore: Remove cursors, stream slicing, and resumable full refresh from declarative Retrievers #827
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
brianjlai
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
brian/remove_cursor_and_rfr_from_simple_retriever
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+63
−646
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
Potential inconsistency between
@abstractmethoddecorator and docstring.The docstring says "underlying Retriever implementations do not need to implement this", but the
@abstractmethoddecorator (line 33) means that concrete subclasses must override this method or they cannot be instantiated. This seems contradictory.Since the
stateproperty had its@abstractmethodremoved (lines 41-48, 50-57), shouldstream_slicesalso have the decorator removed to match the deprecation pattern? Or if we want to keep it abstract, maybe update the docstring to clarify that subclasses should provide a minimal override that calls the parent implementation?Something like:
wdyt?
Length of output: 233
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 839
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 384
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 1152
Length of output: 214
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 4285
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 3258
Remove the
@abstractmethoddecorator to match the deprecation pattern used forstate.You've spotted a real inconsistency! The
Retrieverclass doesn't inherit from ABC (it's a plain class at line 14), which means the@abstractmethoddecorator onstream_slicesis essentially decorative—it doesn't enforce anything. This makes it contradictory alongside the docstring saying implementations "do not need to implement this."The
stateproperty already demonstrates the correct pattern for deprecation: it uses@propertyand@deprecatedwithout@abstractmethod, and neitherAsyncRetrievernorSimpleRetrieveroverride it. Stream slicing should follow the same approach.Removing
@abstractmethodfromstream_sliceswould:stateis handledWdyt—does removing the decorator make sense here?
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents