feat: batch typed decorator

[hjgraca]

Please provide the issue number

Issue number: closes #1033

Summary

Changes

Full support for TypedRecordHandler and TypedRecordHandlerWithContext

public class Product
    {
        public int Id { get; set; }
        public string? Name { get; set; }
        public decimal Price { get; set; }
    }

    public class TypedSqsRecordHandler : ITypedRecordHandler<Product> // (1)!
    {
    	public async Task<RecordHandlerResult> HandleAsync(Product product, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
    	{
    		 /*
    		 * Your business logic with automatic deserialization.
    		 * If an exception is thrown, the item will be marked as a partial batch item failure.
             */

             Logger.LogInformation($"Processing product {product.Id} - {product.Name} (${product.Price})");

             if (product.Id == 4) // (2)!
             {
                 throw new ArgumentException("Error on id 4");
             }

             return await Task.FromResult(RecordHandlerResult.None); // (3)!
         }

	}

    [BatchProcessor(TypedRecordHandler = typeof(TypedSqsRecordHandler))]
    public BatchItemFailuresResponse HandlerUsingTypedAttribute(SQSEvent _)
    {
    	return TypedSqsBatchProcessor.Result.BatchItemFailuresResponse; // (4)!
    }

User experience

Please share what the user experience looks like before and after this change

Checklist

Please leave checklist items unchecked if they do not apply to your change.

• Meets tenets criteria
• I have performed a self-review of this change
• Changes have been tested
• Changes are documented
• PR title follows conventional commit semantics

Is this a breaking change?

RFC issue number:

Checklist:

• Migration process documented
• Implement warnings (if it can live side by side)

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.

[hjgraca]

the documentation file was wrongly formated fixed, so looks like the whole file changed but in reality just one line

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 78.57143% with 48 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 78.33%. Comparing base (12573e5) to head (a83f3d0).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ertools.BatchProcessing/BatchProcessorAttribute.cs	80.35%	17 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
...sing/Internal/TypedBatchProcessingAspectHandler.cs	85.50%	6 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...cessing/Kinesis/TypedKinesisEventBatchProcessor.cs	42.85%	8 Missing ⚠️
...sing/DynamoDb/TypedDynamoDbStreamBatchProcessor.cs	64.28%	5 Missing ⚠️
...ools.BatchProcessing/Sqs/TypedSqsBatchProcessor.cs	78.57%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1034      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    78.17%   78.33%   +0.16%     
===========================================
  Files          298      299       +1     
  Lines        12012    12231     +219     
  Branches      1443     1473      +30     
===========================================
+ Hits          9390     9581     +191     
- Misses        2160     2181      +21     
- Partials       462      469       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[hjgraca]

cc @lachriz-aws

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud