Skip to content

Conversation

@liquidsec
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@TheTechromancer
Copy link
Collaborator

F

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 17, 2025

📊 Performance Benchmark Report

Comparing 3.0 (baseline) vs vulnerability-funeral-2 (current)

📈 Detailed Results (All Benchmarks)

📋 Complete results for all benchmarks - includes both significant and insignificant changes

🧪 Test Name 📏 Base 📏 Current 📈 Change 🎯 Status
Bloom Filter Dns Mutation Tracking Performance 4.25ms 4.15ms -2.4%
Bloom Filter Large Scale Dns Brute Force 18.36ms 17.58ms -4.3%
Large Closest Match Lookup 351.43ms 350.62ms -0.2%
Realistic Closest Match Workload 194.24ms 195.63ms +0.7%
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Small Batch 466.34ms 479.11ms +2.7%
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Large Batch 807.68ms 833.27ms +3.2%
Make Event Autodetection Small 31.16ms 31.30ms +0.5%
Make Event Autodetection Large 316.82ms 317.60ms +0.2%
Make Event Explicit Types 13.88ms 14.02ms +1.1%
Excavate Single Thread Small 4.065s 4.063s -0.1%
Excavate Single Thread Large 9.264s 9.334s +0.8%
Excavate Parallel Tasks Small 4.323s 4.321s -0.1%
Excavate Parallel Tasks Large 7.199s 7.137s -0.9%
Is Ip Performance 3.15ms 3.17ms +0.7%
Make Ip Type Performance 11.40ms 11.47ms +0.7%
Mixed Ip Operations 4.44ms 4.49ms +1.1%
Typical Queue Shuffle 61.54µs 62.16µs +1.0%
Priority Queue Shuffle 696.81µs 684.41µs -1.8%

🎯 Performance Summary

No significant performance changes detected (all changes <10%)


🐍 Python Version 3.11.14

@liquidsec liquidsec changed the title Vulnerability Funeral Merge Vulnerabilities and Findings, add Confidence and Severity to Findings Oct 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants