[SYCL][NFC] Drop confusing std::moves
          #20483
        
          
      
                
     Merged
            
            
          
      
        
          +9
        
        
          −9
        
        
          
        
      
    
  
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
This is similar to #20455 - there is a bunch of places where we call
std::move(const obj &), but target classes do not provideobj(const &&)move constructors, falling back to regularobj(const &)copy constructor, thus making thestd::moveuseless and confusing.This should also help clean up the Coverity scan
(https://scan.coverity.com/projects/intel-llvm?tab=overview), see CIDs
535398,535480,535420and535554. By some reason Coverity thinks that we are using a moved object, whilst in fact no moves were performed, only copies.