- 
          
- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 1.2k
reduce CGO calls when scanning rows #1291
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Open
      
      
            charlievieth
  wants to merge
  1
  commit into
  mattn:master
  
    
      
        
          
  
    
      Choose a base branch
      
     
    
      
        
      
      
        
          
          
        
        
          
            
              
              
              
  
           
        
        
          
            
              
              
           
        
       
     
  
        
          
            
          
            
          
        
       
    
      
from
charlievieth:cev/col-perf
  
      
      
   
  
    
  
  
  
 
  
      
    base: master
Could not load branches
            
              
  
    Branch not found: {{ refName }}
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Could not load tags
            
            
              Nothing to show
            
              
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Are you sure you want to change the base?
            Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
            and old review comments may become outdated.
          
          
  
     Open
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
  File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
      
      Oops, something went wrong.
        
    
  
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I find it somewhat confusing that this ends up using one integer to contain both the derived declared type and also the real column type.
How much savings would there be relative to today if instead of doing this, we just added a function like
static int _sqlite3_column_derived_decltype(sqlite3_stmt* stmt,int iCol)? Then that could return values from your "enum" (0,GO_SQLITE3_DECL_BOOL, orGO_SQLITE3_DECL_DATE), and would not need any bitmasking.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, it's a bit tricky. I originally used two slices to store the derived declared type and real type separately, but switching to using one slice and a the bit mask since it saves an alloc.
Most of the performance improvement here comes from batching the CGO calls needed to get the column's declared and real type (basically, the performance improvement comes from reducing the number of CGO calls - see
BenchmarkStmt10Cols). So going back to having to call a CGO function for each column would negate most of the performance improvements here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To follow up on my above comment,
BenchmarkStmt10Colsshows how batching CGO calls instead of performing them for each column improves performance (here we see a 30% perf improvement, which roughly scales with the number of columns being scanned).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to clarify, my above comments assume that you're suggesting we call this new function in the per-column loop in
bind(that is we call it for each column instead of batching the calls). If that is the case then it would negate most of the performance gains here. If you meant something else could you elaborate (just want to make sure we're on the same page here)?