-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
fix: Prevent race condition on updateContext #84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @fabriziodemaria, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request resolves a critical race condition identified in the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
00b8ef0 to
ec5f9a4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request addresses a race condition in updateContext by introducing an AsyncSerialQueue actor to serialize concurrent updates. The approach is sound and effectively resolves the reported crash. A new test case has been added to verify the fix by simulating concurrent access, which is great.
My review includes two main points:
- A suggestion to make the new concurrency test more robust by asserting the final state, rather than just checking for a crash.
- A more critical concern about a remaining race condition. The introduction of
contextUpdateQueuecreates a second synchronization mechanism alongside the existingDispatchQueue. This can lead to data races on shared state (likeevaluationContext) between methods synchronized differently, such asupdateContextandsetProvider. I've detailed this in a comment and recommend unifying the synchronization strategy for theOpenFeatureAPIclass.
Overall, this is a good fix for the immediate problem, but the underlying concurrency management of the OpenFeatureAPI class needs a more holistic review to ensure thread safety.
Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Demaria <fabrizio.f.demaria@gmail.com>
ec5f9a4 to
ea3ff82
Compare
Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Demaria <fabrizio.f.demaria@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Demaria <fabrizio.f.demaria@gmail.com>
8ae32f3 to
49643da
Compare
Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Demaria <fabrizio.f.demaria@gmail.com>
2077280 to
f52d643
Compare
Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Demaria <fabrizio.f.demaria@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Demaria <fabrizio.f.demaria@gmail.com>
580f4d6 to
2a0aad0
Compare
Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Demaria <fabrizio.f.demaria@gmail.com>
2a0aad0 to
8cc95c9
Compare
This PR
Fixes possible race conditions detected when running updateEvaluationContextAndWait in parallel
Testing
Note that each of the three added tests fails without the proposed fixes
Notes
Stacktrace for the original crash: