Skip to content

Conversation

@mtrezza
Copy link
Member

@mtrezza mtrezza commented Nov 9, 2025

Pull Request

Issue

Various optimizations.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests

    • Adjusted performance benchmark parameters to reduce execution time.
  • Chores

    • Simplified CI workflow documentation by removing benchmark configuration details.

@parse-github-assistant
Copy link

🚀 Thanks for opening this pull request!

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 9, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes reduce benchmark configuration parameters: iteration count drops from 10,000 to 1,000, and cleanup wait time drops from 10 seconds to 1 second. The CI workflow comment is simplified to remove benchmark iteration and CPU affinity details.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CI Workflow Comment Update
.github/workflows/ci-performance.yml
Removed PR-comment text describing benchmark iteration count (10,000) and CPU pinning details; comment now contains only thresholds note
Benchmark Configuration Reduction
benchmark/performance.js
Reduced default ITERATIONS from 10000 to 1000; reduced final cleanup wait time from 10000 ms to 1000 ms

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Verify that reducing iterations from 10,000 to 1,000 maintains sufficient statistical significance for performance benchmarks
  • Confirm the 10-fold reduction in cleanup wait time (10s → 1s) does not cause premature exit or resource cleanup issues
  • Ensure the parameter changes are intentional and align with performance testing goals

Possibly related PRs

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3cc8c1a and ed89c76.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/ci-performance.yml (1 hunks)
  • benchmark/performance.js (2 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@mtrezza mtrezza merged commit 133660f into parse-community:alpha Nov 9, 2025
22 of 25 checks passed
@parseplatformorg
Copy link
Contributor

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@mtrezza mtrezza deleted the ci/perf-fix branch November 9, 2025 18:00
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 9, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.07%. Comparing base (3cc8c1a) to head (ed89c76).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on alpha.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            alpha    #9927   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.07%   93.07%           
=======================================
  Files         187      187           
  Lines       15224    15224           
  Branches      177      177           
=======================================
  Hits        14170    14170           
  Misses       1042     1042           
  Partials       12       12           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants