Skip to content

gh-140578: Doc: Remove sencence implying that concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor does not exist #140689

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

gh-140578: Doc: Remove sencence implying that concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor does not exist #140689

wants to merge 3 commits into from
+8 −2

Conversation

@paternal
Copy link

@paternal paternal commented Oct 27, 2025 •
edited by github-actions bot
Loading

@paternal paternal requested a review from gpshead as a code owner October 27, 2025 22:08
@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label Oct 27, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Todo in Docs PRs Oct 27, 2025
@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2025
Open
@python-cla-bot
Copy link

python-cla-bot bot commented Oct 27, 2025 •
edited
Loading

All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement.

CLA signed

@paternal
Copy link
Author

I am the author of issue #140578, which is closed by this pull request. This pull request, is, IMHO, more precise than #140604, that does not remove the offending part, and breaks rst syntax.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@gpshead gpshead Awaiting requested review from gpshead gpshead is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

awaiting review docs Documentation in the Doc dir

Projects

Docs PRs
Status: Todo

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Documentation for multiprocessing module wrongly states that concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor does not exist

1 participant

@paternal