-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 216
meson.build fixes #1225
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
BalkanMadman
wants to merge
2
commits into
quickjs-ng:master
Choose a base branch
from
BalkanMadman:meson-fixes
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
meson.build fixes #1225
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does the override work even if this is the default?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it does. However, the most use-cases I can think of (distributions, individuals) require shared libraries so hardcoding
default_library=staticseems like a bug to me.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Considering that the default for meson is
default_library=shared, I don't really see a reason to override it inmeson.build. Does your CI require it?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's likely why it failed.
In addition our CMake setup defaults to static builds, so Meson should align to that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd be okay with using meson defaults. cmake's default is more an accident of history that we inherit, I think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In cmake it's controlled by a flag (
-BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ONor off), it's just that cmake defaults to static if not otherwise specified. Our CMakeListst.txt is agnostic as to whether it should produce static or shared libraries.(Long-winded way of saying that whatever the cmake build does is not under discussion, it just is.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd argue it's the opposite. Every tool I've seen out there installing JS engines like jsvu makes static builds.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, as far as I understand, tools installing JS engines mostly care about engine executables, not the provided lib. Obviously, the type of libqjs doesn't have influence on the executables.
For the consumers of the actual QuickJS-NG API, i.e. libqjs, it'd most likely be shared not static libraries they'd need.
In any case, that's not the hill to die on. I'm just arguing that, in my opinion, the consumers of your library API would prefer a shared lib, as with most other APIs out there.
The choice is up to you anyways.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah sorry my bad. As long as building the executable statically links the library by default I don't think I care much about what the default for building a library is.
We haven't called a 1.0 yet so I think we have plenty of wiggle room to try things out.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the shared library is built, then the executable is linked dynamically to it via
executable(..., dependencies: qjs_dep).For CI, the static (or shared) lib build can always be forced via the cmdline switch
-Ddefault_library=(static|shared)