Skip to content

Conversation

@mattnappo
Copy link

No description provided.

@semanticdiff-com
Copy link

semanticdiff-com bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Review changes with  SemanticDiff

Changed Files
File Status
  src/lib/nodes/list.tsx  0% smaller

Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Greptile Overview

Greptile Summary

This PR adds a --state filtering option to the sf nodes list command, allowing users to filter nodes by their status (pending, awaitingcapacity, running, released, failed, terminated, deleted). The implementation uses Commander.js's .choices() method for input validation and allows multiple states to be specified with repeated flags (e.g., --state pending --state running). The filtering logic is applied client-side after fetching all nodes from the API, maintaining consistency with existing patterns in the codebase. The feature integrates cleanly with the existing node listing functionality and follows established TypeScript patterns for type safety.

Important Files Changed

Filename Score Overview
src/lib/nodes/list.tsx 4/5 Added --state filtering option with validation, argument parsing, and client-side filtering logic for node status

Confidence score: 4/5

  • This PR is safe to merge with minimal risk and provides a useful filtering feature for node management
  • Score reflects solid implementation following established patterns, proper type safety, and good input validation, but loses one point due to the complex type casting required for Commander.js options integration
  • Pay close attention to the type casting in the filtering logic to ensure it handles edge cases properly

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CLI as CLI Command
    participant Auth as Auth Helper
    participant Client as Nodes Client
    participant API as SFC API
    participant Display as Display Components

    User->>CLI: "sf nodes list --state pending --state running"
    CLI->>Auth: "getAuthToken()"
    Auth-->>CLI: "token or null"
    
    alt token exists
        CLI->>Client: "nodesClient(token)"
        Client-->>CLI: "client instance"
        CLI->>CLI: "ora('Fetching nodes...').start()"
        CLI->>Client: "client.nodes.list()"
        Client->>API: "GET /nodes"
        API-->>Client: "{ data: nodes[] }"
        Client-->>CLI: "{ data: nodes }"
        CLI->>CLI: "spinner.stop()"
        
        CLI->>CLI: "filter nodes by selected states"
        
        alt json option
            CLI->>User: "JSON.stringify(filteredNodes)"
        else no nodes found
            CLI->>User: "No nodes found. Create your first node:"
        else verbose option
            CLI->>Display: "render(<NodesVerboseDisplay nodes={filteredNodes} />)"
            Display-->>User: "detailed node information"
        else default display
            CLI->>CLI: "createNodesTable(filteredNodes)"
            CLI->>CLI: "collect actions from nodes"
            CLI->>User: "table output + next steps"
        end
    else no token
        CLI->>User: "Not logged in. Please run 'sf login' first."
    end
    
    Note over CLI,API: Error handling via handleNodesError() for any API failures
Loading

Context used:

  • Context from dashboard - .cursor/rules/cli.mdc (source)

1 file reviewed, 1 comment

Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile

spinner.stop();

// Apply optional state filter if provided
const selectedStates = (options as unknown as { state?: string[] }).state;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

style: Type assertion is unsafe. Consider adding proper type definition for options parameter or using type guards.

Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!

Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: src/lib/nodes/list.tsx
Line: 470:470

Comment:
**style:** Type assertion is unsafe. Consider adding proper type definition for options parameter or using type guards.

<sub>Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!</sub>

How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant