-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
feat: Add OpenTelemetry instrumentation #525
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…hecks from pre-commit, fix taskiq-python#417
| content: "97DC185FE0A2F5B123861F0790FDFB26" # pragma: allowlist secret | ||
| - - meta | ||
| - name: "yandex-verification" | ||
| content: "9b105f7c58cbc920" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why pragma: allowlist secret is here?
As I see, we already exclude this file from detect-secrets pre-commit hook check. Is some other linter checks fails on this lines?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
even with exclusion in .pre-commit-config.yaml, still seeing this without pragmas
Detect secrets...........................................................Failed
- hook id: detect-secrets
- exit code: 1
ERROR: Potential secrets about to be committed to git repo!
Secret Type: Base64 High Entropy String
Location: docs\README.md:17
Secret Type: Hex High Entropy String
Location: docs\README.md:20
Secret Type: Hex High Entropy String
Location: docs\README.md:23
Possible mitigations:
- For information about putting your secrets in a safer place, please ask in
#security
- Mark false positives with an inline `pragma: allowlist secret` comment
If a secret has already been committed, visit
https://help.github.com/articles/removing-sensitive-data-from-a-repositoryThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thats strange...
I checked on my fork and anything seems to be fine:
(taskiq) git pull
Already up to date.
(taskiq) git st
On branch master
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/master'.
nothing to commit, working tree clean
(taskiq) pre-commit install
pre-commit installed at .git/hooks/pre-commit
(taskiq) pre-commit run detect-secrets --all-files
Detect secrets...........................................................Passed
Are you sure that you run poetry install --all-extras && pre-commit install after rebase? I don't really know that else can be a problem
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In any case - it's not a blocker to merge this MR. I will deal with it later if we don't find the root cause of this strange pre-commit hook behaviour.
taskiq/package.py
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | |||
| # for compatibility with opentelemetry-instrumentation | |||
| _instruments = ("taskiq >= 0.11.19",) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just wondering: do we need to update version in this file on every release?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tests/opentelemetry/test_tasks.py
Outdated
|
|
||
| self.assertEqual(result.return_value, {"key": "value"}) | ||
|
|
||
| @pytest.mark.anyio |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I enabled anyio_mode = "auto" flag for pytest. So tests doesn't need to explicitly say that they are async with pytest.mark.anyio marker.
You can just remove it and tests should work as they were)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
| --- | ||
| """ | ||
|
|
||
| from __future__ import annotations |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like everything works fine without this import. Maybe we can remove it?
As far as I can see, there are no other places in the taskiq repo where __future__ is used.
| from taskiq import AsyncBroker | ||
| from taskiq.middlewares.opentelemetry_middleware import OpenTelemetryMiddleware | ||
|
|
||
| if TYPE_CHECKING: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we have an empty if statement here?
No description provided.