Skip to content

Conversation

@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor

@gottesmm gottesmm commented Nov 4, 2025

Specifically, we are already using XCTest expectations to make sure we are waiting long enough. So it is appropriate to put nonisolated(unsafe) since we are synchronizing the code in a way that swift concurrency does not understand.

This came up as part of fixing rdar://164042741.

…n the tests.

Specifically, we are already using XCTest expectations to make sure we are waiting
long enough. So it is appropriate to put nonisolated(unsafe) since we are
synchronizing the code in a way that swift concurrency does not understand.

This came up as part of fixing rdar://164042741.
@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

gottesmm commented Nov 4, 2025

Swift PR: swiftlang/swift#85164

@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

gottesmm commented Nov 4, 2025

swiftlang/swift#85164

@swift-ci test

Copy link
Member

@ahoppen ahoppen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

gottesmm commented Nov 5, 2025

swiftlang/swift#85164

@swift-ci test

@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

gottesmm commented Nov 6, 2025

swiftlang/swift#85164

@swift-ci test windows platform

@gottesmm gottesmm merged commit 1dc4296 into swiftlang:main Nov 7, 2025
3 checks passed
@gottesmm gottesmm deleted the rdar164042741 branch November 7, 2025 03:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants